Slack Center Pleistocene Levallois stone-machine technology in southwest China

Slack Center Pleistocene Levallois stone-machine technology in southwest China


Levallois approaches are undoubtedly one of presumably the most tasty identified variants of ready-core applied sciences, and are a extraordinarily fundamental hallmark of stone applied sciences developed around 300,000 years prior to now in Africa and west Eurasia1,2. Present archaeological proof suggests that the stone technology of east Asian hominins lacked a Levallois ingredient for the length of the late Center Pleistocene epoch and it is not till the Slack Pleistocene (around forty,000–30,000 years prior to now) that this technology spread into east Asia in association with a dispersal of in model folk. Here we masks proof of Levallois technology from the lithic assemblage of the Guanyindong Cave location in southwest China, dated to approximately 170,000–eighty,000 years prior to now. To our knowledge, this is the earliest proof of Levallois technology in east Asia. Our findings thus enlighten the new model of the foundation and spread of Levallois applied sciences in east Asia and its hyperlinks to a Slack Pleistocene dispersal of in model folk.

In finding admission to alternativesIn finding admission to alternatives

Subscribe to Journal

In finding fleshy journal access for 1 year


handiest $Three.ninety per field

All costs are NET costs.

VAT will doubtless be added later in the checkout.

Rent or Decide article

In finding time runt or fleshy article access on ReadCube.

from$eight.ninety 9

All costs are NET costs.

Recordsdata availability

All data are readily accessible from the corresponding authors upon cheap query.

Extra knowledge

Publisher’s masks: Springer Nature remains just in regards to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Monnier, G. F. The Decrease/Center Paleolithic periodization in western Europe: an outline. Curr. Anthropol. 47, 709–744 (2006).

  2. 2.

    Mcbrearty, S. & Brooks, A. S. The revolution that wasn’t: a brand new interpretation of the foundation of in model human behavior. J. Hum. Evol. 39, 453–563 (2000).

  3. Three.

    Lycett, S. J. & Eren, M. I. Levallois lessons: the enlighten of integrating mathematical fashions, quantitative experiments and the archaeological account. World Archaeol. forty five, 519–538 (2013).

  4. Four.

    Foley, R. & Lahr, M. M. Mode Three applied sciences and the evolution of in model folk. Camb. Archaeol. J. 7, Three–36 (1997).

  5. 5.

    Adler, D. S. et al. Early Levallois technology and the Decrease to Center Paleolithic transition in the Southern Caucasus. Science 345, 1609–1613 (2014).

  6. 6.

    Tryon, C. A., McBrearty, S. & Texier, P.-J. Levallois lithic technology from the Kapthurin formation, Kenya: Acheulian foundation and Center Stone Age differ. Afr. Archaeol. Rev. 22, 199–229 (2005).

  7. 7.

    Akhilesh, Okay. et al. Early Center Palaeolithic custom in India around 385–172 ka reframes Out of Africa fashions. Nature 554, ninety seven–101 (2018).

  8. eight.

    Boëda, E., Hou, Y. M., Forestier, H., Sarel, J. & Wang, H. M. Levallois and non-Levallois blade manufacturing at Shuidonggou in Ningxia, North China. Quat. Int. 295, 191–203 (2013).

  9. 9.

    Li, F., Chen, F., Wang, Y. & Gao, X. Technology diffusion and inhabitants migration mirrored in blade applied sciences in northern China in the Slack Pleistocene. Sci. China Earth Sci. 59, 1540–1553 (2016).

  10. 10.

    Brantingham, P. J., Olsen, J. W., Rech, J. A. & Krivoshapkin, A. I. Raw fabric advantageous and ready core applied sciences in northeast Asia. J. Archaeol. Sci. 27, 255–271 (2000).

  11. Eleven.

    Li, F. et al. The easternmost Center Paleolithic (Mousterian) from Jinsitai Cave, North China. J. Hum. Evol. 114, 76–Eighty Four (2018).

  12. 12.

    Seong, C. & Bae, C. J. The eastern Asian ‘Center Palaeolithic’ revisited: a watch from Korea. Antiquity ninety, 1151–1165 (2016).

  13. thirteen.

    Sato, H., Nishiaki, Y. & Suzuki, M. in The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology (eds Dibble, H. L. & Bar-Yosef, O.) 485–500 (Prehistory Press, Madison, 1995).

    • 14.

      Zwyns, N. in Encyclopedia of World Archaeology (eds Gladyshev, S. et al.) 5025–5032 (Springer, Fresh York, 2014).

      • 15.

        Gao, X. & Norton, C. J. A critique of the Chinese ‘Center Palaeolithic’. Antiquity 76, 397–412 (2002).

      • 16.

        Li, Y. & Wen, B. Guanyindong: A Decrease Paleolithic Verbalize at Qianxi County, Guizhou Province (Cultural Relics Press, Beijing, China, 1986).

        • 17.

          Shen, G. J. & Jin, L. H. U-assortment courting of speleothem samples from Guanyindong Cave at Qianxi County, Guizhou Province. Acta Anthropologica Sinica Eleven, 93–a hundred (1992).

        • 18.

          Yuan, S. X., Chen, T. M. & Gao, S. J. Uranium assortment chronological sequence of some Paleolithic web sites in South China. Acta Anthropologica Sinica 5, 179–100 ninety (1986).

        • 19.

          Grün, R., Eggins, S., Kinsley, L., Moseley, H., Sambridge, M. Laser ablation U-assortment diagnosis of fossil bones and teeth. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 416, a hundred and fifty–167 (2014). 

        • 20.

          Lisiecki, L. E. & Raymo, M. E. A Pliocene–Pleistocene stack of fifty seven globally distributed benthic δ18O files. Paleoceanography 20, PA1003 (2005).

        • 21.

          Wang, W. et al. Panxian Dadong, South China: setting up a account of Center Pleistocene climatic changes. Asian Perspect. forty three, 302–313 (2004).

        • 22.

          Karkanas, P., Schepartz, L. A., Miller-Antonio, S., Wang, W. & Huang, W. Slack Center Pleistocene climate in southwestern China: inferences from the stratigraphic account of Panxian Dadong Cave, Guizhou. Quat. Sci. Rev. 27, 1555–1570 (2008).

        • 23.

          Richter, D. et al. The age of the hominin fossils from Jebel Irhoud, Morocco, and the origins of the Center Stone Age. Nature 546, 293–296 (2017).

        • 24.

          Hershkovitz, I. et al. The earliest in model folk commence air Africa. Science 359, 456–459 (2018).

        • 25.

          Liu, W. et al. Human remains from Zhirendong, South China, and trendy human emergence in East Asia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 19201–19206 (2010).

        • 26.

          Liu, W. et al. The earliest unequivocally in model folk in southern China. Nature 526, 696–699 (2015).

        • 27.

          Li, Z.-Y. et al. Slack Pleistocene old human crania from Xuchang, China. Science 355, 969–972 (2017).

        • 28.

          Fu, Q. et al. DNA diagnosis of an early in model human from Tianyuan Cave, China. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA a hundred and ten, 2223–2227 (2013).

        • 29.

          Yamei, H. et al. Mid-Pleistocene Acheulean-be pleased stone technology of the Bose basin, South China. Science 287, 1622–1626 (2000).

        • 30.

          Li, H., Kuman, Okay. & Li, C. What’s currently (un)identified in regards to the Chinese Acheulean, with implications for hypotheses on the sooner dispersal of hominids. C. R. Palevol. 17, a hundred and twenty–100 thirty (2016).

        • 31.

          Boëda, E. in The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois Technology (eds Dibble, H. & Bar-Yosef, O.) 41–68 (Prehistory Press, Madison, 1995).

          • 32.

            Brantingham, P. J. & Kuhn, S. L. Constraints on Levallois core technology: a mathematical model. J. Archaeol. Sci. 28, 747–761 (2001).

          • 33.

            Eren, M. I. & Lycett, S. J. Why Levallois? A morphometric comparison of experimental ‘preferential’ Levallois flakes versus debitage flakes. PLoS ONE 7, e29273 (2012).

          • 34.

            White, M., Ashton, N. & Scott, B. in The Frail Human Occupation of Britain (eds Ashton, N. et al.) 53–Sixty six (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2011).

            • 35.

              Van Conception, P. The Levallois prick payment scheme (Prehistory Press, Madison, 1992).

              • 36.

                Schlanger, N. Conception Levallois: lithic technology and cognitive archaeology. Camb. Archaeol. J. 6, 231–254 (1996).

              • 37.

                Mellars, P. A. The Neanderthal Legacy: An Archaeological Perspective from Western Europe (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1995).

                • 38.

                  Monnier, G. F. & Missal, Okay. One other Mousterian Debate? Bordian facies, chaîne opératoire technocomplexes, and patterns of lithic variability in the western European Center and Upper Pleistocene. Quat. Int. 350, 59–eighty three (2014).

                • 39.

                  Malinsky-Buller, A. The clutter in the Center Pleistocene: the Decrease–Center Paleolithic transition from the Levantine perspective. J. World Prehist. 29, 1–seventy eight (2016).

                • forty.

                  Barzilai, O., Malinsky-Buller, A. & Ackermann, O. Kefar Menachem West: a Decrease Paleolithic location in the southern Shephela, Israel. J. Israel Prehist. Soc. 36, 7–38 (2006).

                • 41.

                  White, M. & Ashton, N. Decrease Palaeolithic core technology and the origins of the Levallois map in north-western Europe. Curr. Anthropol. Forty Four, 598–609 (2003).

                • forty two.

                  Niu, D. et al. The initial Upper Palaeolithic in northwest China: new proof of cultural variability and alternate from Shuidonggou locality 7. Quat. Int. Four hundred, 111–119 (2016).

                • forty three.

                  Shimelmitz, R., Weinstein-Evron, M., Ronen, A. & Kuhn, S. L. The Decrease to Center Paleolithic transition and the diversification of Levallois technology in the Southern Levant: proof from Tabun Cave, Israel. Quat. Int. 409, 23–forty (2016).

                • Forty Four.

                  Brantingham, P. J., Kuhn, S. L. & Kerry, Okay. W. The Early Upper Paleolithic beyond Western Europe (California Univ. Press, 2004).

                  • forty five.

                    Cahen, D. Les industries préhistoriques des nappes alluviales de Petit-Spiennes et de Mesvin. Notae Praehistoricae 1, 70–74 (1981).

                  • Forty six.

                    Cahen, D., Haesaerts, P. & Watteyne, D. La nappe alluviale de Petit-Spiennes et le début du débitage levallois dans la vallée de la Haine. Archaeologia Belgica Bruxelles 1, 7–16 (1985).

                  • 47.

                    Watteyne, D. Petit-Spiennes: industrie (s) a débitage Levallois et para-Levallois. Notae Praehistoricae 5, 95–104 (1985).

                  • forty eight.

                    Roe, D. A. The Decrease and Center Palaeolithic Classes in Britain Vol. Forty six (Routledge, London, 2014).

                    • Forty 9.

                      Otte, M. in The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois technology (eds Dibble, H. & Bar-Yosef, O.) 117–124 (Prehistory Press, Madison, 1995).

                      • 50.

                        Ryssaert, C. Some new insights in an dilapidated assortment: lithic technology at Mesvin IV. Notae Praehistoricae 26, ninety one–ninety 9 (2006).

                        • fifty one.

                          Kuhn, S. L. Mousterian Lithic Technology (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1995).

                          • 52.

                            Delagnes, A. in The Definition and Interpretation of Levallois technology Monographs in World Archaeology Vol. 23 (eds Bar-Yosef, O. & Dibble, H.) 201–212 (Prehistory Press, Madison, 1995).

                            • 53.

                              Chazan, M. Redefining Levallois. J. Hum. Evol. 33, 719–735 (1997).

                            • fifty four.

                              Picin, A. Technological adaptation and the emergence of Levallois in Central Europe: new insight from the Markkleeberg and Zwochau commence-air web sites in Germany. J. Quat. Sci. 33, 300–312 (2018).

                            • fifty five.

                              Boëda, E. & Pelegrin, J. Approche technologique du nucleus levallois a éclat. Etudes Préhistoriques Lyon 15, 41–forty eight (1979).

                            • fifty six.

                              Boëda, E. Approche technologique du knowing Levallois et évaluation de son champ d’application: étude de trois gisement saaliens et weichseliens de la France septentrionale. PhD thesis, Université de Paris X (1986).

                              • fifty seven.

                                Scott, R. The Early Center Palaeolithic of Britain; origins, technology and landscape. PhD thesis, Durham University (2006).

                                • fifty eight.

                                  Bolton, L. Assessing the Origins of Levallois through Decrease Palaeolithic Core Variation: A Comparative Scrutinize of Straightforward Energetic Cores in Northwest Europe. PhD thesis, University of Southampton (2015).

                                  • 59.

                                    Huntley, D. J., Godfrey-Smith, D. I. & Thewalt, M. L. W. Optical courting of sediments. Nature 313, 105–107 (1985).

                                  • 60.

                                    Aitken, M. J. An Introduction to Optical Relationship (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 1998).

                                    • 61.

                                      Roberts, R. G. et al. Optical courting in archaeology: thirty years on reflection and monumental challenges for the future. J. Archaeol. Sci. fifty six, 41–60 (2015).

                                    • Sixty two.

                                      Wintle, A. G. Luminescence courting: laboratory procedures and protocols. Radiat. Meas. 27, 769–817 (1997).

                                    • sixty three.

                                      Bøtter-Jensen, L. & Mejdahl, V. Evaluation of beta dose-payment the utilization of a GM multicounter machine. Int. J. Rad. Appl. Instrum. D 14, 187–191 (1988).

                                    • Sixty Four.

                                      Rhodes, E. J. & Schwenninger, J.-L. Dose rates and radioisotope concentrations in the concrete calibration blocks at Oxford. Frail TL 25, 5–eight (2007).

                                    • 65.

                                      Mercier, N. & Falguères, C. Field gamma dose-payment measurement with a NaI(Tl) detector: 2d look of the “threshold” scheme. Anc. TL 25, 1–Four (2007).

                                    • Sixty six.

                                      Prescott, J. R. & Hutton, J. T. Cosmic-ray contributions to dose rates for luminescence and ESR courting: colossal depths and long-timeframe time variations. Radiat. Meas. 23, 497–500 (1994).

                                    • 67.

                                      Smith, M. A., Prescott, J. R. & Head, M. J. Comparability of 14C and luminescence chronologies at Puritjarra rock refuge, central Australia. Quat. Sci. Rev. 16, 299–320 (1997).

                                    • 68.

                                      Bøtter-Jensen, L., Andersen, C. E., Duller, G. A. T. & Murray, A. S. Dispositions in radiation, stimulation and observation products and services in luminescence measurements. Radiat. Meas. 37, 535–541 (2003).

                                    • Sixty 9.

                                      Bøtter-Jensen, L., Bulur, E., Duller, G. A. T. & Murray, A. S. Advances in luminescence instrument techniques. Radiat. Meas. 32, 523–528 (2000).

                                    • 70.

                                      Galbraith, R. F., Roberts, R. G., Laslett, G. M., Yoshida, H. & Olley, J. M. Optical courting of single and various grains of quartz from Jinmium rock refuge, northern Australia: portion 1, experimental form and statistical fashions. Archaeometry 41, 339–364 (1999).

                                    • seventy one.

                                      Murray, A. S. & Wintle, A. G. Luminescence courting of quartz the utilization of an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Radiat. Meas. 32, fifty seven–seventy three (2000).

                                    • 72.

                                      Duller, G. A. T. Distinguishing quartz and feldspar in single grain luminescence measurements. Radiat. Meas. 37, 161–a hundred sixty 5 (2003).

                                    • seventy three.

                                      Jacobs, Z., Duller, G. A. T. & Wintle, A. G. Interpretation of single grain D
                                      e distributions and calculation of D
                                      e. Radiat. Meas. 41, 264–277 (2006).

                                    • 74.

                                      Galbraith, R. F. & Roberts, R. G. Statistical aspects of identical dose and mistake calculation and issue in OSL courting: an account for and some suggestions. Quat. Geochronol. Eleven, 1–27 (2012).

                                    • Seventy five.

                                      Gliganic, L. A., Jacobs, Z., Roberts, R. G., Domínguez-Rodrigo, M. & Mabulla, A. Z. P. Fresh ages for Center and Later Stone Age deposits at Mumba rockshelter, Tanzania: optically stimulated luminescence courting of quartz and feldspar grains. J. Hum. Evol. Sixty two, 533–547 (2012).

                                    • 76.

                                      Duller, G. A. T. Bettering the accuracy and precision of identical doses obvious the utilization of the optically stimulated luminescence signal from single grains of quartz. Radiat. Meas. 47, 770–777 (2012).

                                    • seventy seven.

                                      Thomsen, Okay. J. et al. Attempting out single-grain quartz OSL recommendations the utilization of sediment samples with just age control from the Bordes-Fitte rockshelter (Roches d’Abilly location, Central France). Quat. Geochronol. 31, seventy seven–Ninety six (2016).

                                    • seventy eight.

                                      Guo, Y.-J. et al. Fresh ages for the Upper Palaeolithic location of Xibaimaying in the Nihewan Basin, northern China: implications for shrimp-machine and microblade industries in north-east Asia for the length of Marine Isotope Phases 2 and Three. J. Quat. Sci. 32, 540–552 (2017).

                                    • seventy 9.

                                      Li, B., Jacobs, Z. & Roberts, R. G. Investigation of the applicability of standardised enhance curves for OSL courting of quartz from Haua Fteah cave, Libya. Quat. Geochronol. 35, 1–15 (2016).

                                    • eighty.

                                      Li, B., Jacobs, Z., Roberts, R. G., Galbraith, R. & Peng, J. Variability in quartz OSL signals brought about by measurement uncertainties: complications and alternatives. Quat. Geochronol. 41, Eleven–25 (2017).

                                    • Eighty one.

                                      Roberts, H. M. & Duller, G. A. T. Standardised enhance curves for optical courting of sediment the utilization of various-grain aliquots. Radiat. Meas. 38, 241–252 (2004).

                                    • 82.

                                      Li, B., Roberts, R. G., Jacobs, Z. & Li, S. H. Possible of setting up a ‘global standardised enhance curve’ (gSGC) for optical courting of quartz from sediments. Quat. Geochronol. 27, ninety four–104 (2015).

                                    • eighty three.

                                      Roberts, R. G., Galbraith, R. F., Yoshida, H., Laslett, G. M. & Olley, J. M. Distinguishing dose populations in sediment combos: a take a look at of single-grain optical courting procedures the utilization of combos of laboratory-dosed quartz. Radiat. Meas. 32, 459–465 (2000).

                                    • Eighty Four.

                                      Galbraith, R. F. & Inexperienced, P. F. Estimating the ingredient ages in a finite combination. Int. J. Rad. Appl. Instrum. D 17, 197–206 (1990).

                                    • eighty five.

                                      Guralnik, B. et al. Radiation-brought about enhance and isothermal decay of infrared-stimulated luminescence from feldspar. Radiat. Meas. Eighty one, 224–231 (2015).

                                    • 86.

                                      Rousseeuw, P. J. & Croux, C. Picks to the median absolute deviation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 88, 1273–1283 (1993).

                                    • 87.

                                      Rousseeuw, P. J., Debruyne, M., Engelen, S. & Hubert, M. Robustness and outlier detection in chemometrics. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 36, 221–242 (2006).

                                    • 88.

                                      Arnold, L. J. & Roberts, R. G. Stochastic modelling of multi-grain identical dose (D
                                      e) distributions: implications for OSL courting of sediment combos. Quat. Geochronol. Four, 204–230 (2009).

                                    Accumulate references


                                    This work was once supported by the Australian Compare Council through Future Fellowships to B.L. (FT140100384) and B.M. (FT140100101), a grant from the Nationwide Science Foundation of China to J.-F.Z. (NSFC, 41471003), postgraduate scholarships from the University of Wollongong to Y.H. and X.R. and the China Scholarship Council to X.R. (201506010345), the Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) Strategic Priority Compare Program Grants of ‘Macroevolutionary Processes and Paleoenvironments of Fundamental Historic Biota’ (XDPB05), Verbalize Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, CAS (SKLLQG1501) and Nationwide Science Foundation of China (41272033) to Y.-M.H. We thank S. Lin for support with artefact diagnosis and salubrious comments on the manuscript; Y.-M. Hou for support with CT scanning on stone artefacts; R. G. Roberts, Z. Jacobs, Y. Jafari and T. Lachlan for enhance and support in the OSL laboratory; M. Otte and P. Zhang for salubrious discussions on lithic assemblage; Y.-S. Lou, N. Ma, X.-W. Li and L. Lei for support with lithic observation.

                                    Reviewer knowledge

                                    Nature thanks C. A. Tryon and the a quantity of anonymous reviewer(s) for his or her contribution to the behold review of this work.

                                    Author knowledge


                                    1. Centre for Archaeological Science, College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Fresh South Wales, Australia

                                      • Yue Hu
                                      • , Ben Marwick
                                      • , Xue Rui
                                      •  & Bo Li
                                    2. Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

                                      • Ben Marwick
                                    3. MOE Laboratory for Earth Floor Processes, Department of Geography, Faculty of Metropolis and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, China

                                      • Jia-Fu Zhang
                                    4. Key Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

                                      • Ya-Mei Hou
                                      • , Jian-Ping Yue
                                      •  & Wei-Wen Huang
                                    5. CAS Centre for Excellence in Lifestyles and Paleo-atmosphere, Beijing, China

                                      • Ya-Mei Hou
                                      •  & Jian-Ping Yue
                                    6. Qianxi County Bureau of Cultural Relics Protection, Bijie, China

                                      • Wen-Rong Chen
                                    7. ARC Centre of Excellence for Australian Biodiversity and Heritage, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Fresh South Wales, Australia

                                      • Bo Li


                                    1. Uncover for Yue Hu in:

                                    2. Uncover for Ben Marwick in:

                                    3. Uncover for Jia-Fu Zhang in:

                                    4. Uncover for Xue Rui in:

                                    5. Uncover for Ya-Mei Hou in:

                                    6. Uncover for Jian-Ping Yue in:

                                    7. Uncover for Wen-Rong Chen in:

                                    8. Uncover for Wei-Wen Huang in:

                                    9. Uncover for Bo Li in:


                                    B.L., Y.H., W.-W.H. and J.-F.Z. conceived and coordinated the look; Y.H., B.M. and J.-P.Y. performed the stone artefact diagnosis; B.L., Y.H., J.-F.Z., W.-R.C., W.-W.H. and Y.-M.H. deliberate and directed field investigations and stratigraphic diagnosis. Y.H., B.L., J.-F.Z., X.R., W.-W.H. and Y.-M.H. soundless samples for courting; Y.H., B.L., J.-F.Z. and X.R. measured OSL samples and analysed the courting results; B.M., B.L. and Y.H. wrote the manuscript, with contributions from the a quantity of authors.

                                    Competing interests

                                    The authors expose no competing interests.

                                    Corresponding authors

                                    Correspondence to
                                    Ben Marwick or Bo Li.

                                    Extended data figures and tables

                                    1. Extended Recordsdata Fig. 1 Photography exhibiting the landscape and placement of the Guanyindong Cave.

                                      a, Southward watch of the Guanyindong Cave. b, The principle entrance of the cave.

                                    2. Extended Recordsdata Fig. 2 Conception watch and stratigraphy of the Guanyindong Cave.

                                      a, Conception watch of the cave, fundamental excavation space and the residual profiles from the south wall. The blue dots and the numbers next to every of the dots symbolize the locations of U-assortment courting samples were taken beforehand17 (glance Supplementary Recordsdata for discussion of the U-assortment results); sample codes from 1 to eight are QGC-19-1, QGC-19-2, QGC-Four, QGC-21, QGB-Four, QGC-7 and QGC-23, respectively. The inexperienced circles are the locations of profiles 1, 2a, 2b and Three. The red squares converse the locations of the residual profiles S1 and S2, the do the OSL samples were taken. b, Factor of the numbered stratigraphic layers at the first entrance of the cave. The stratigraphic layer numbers are shown in yellow circles. The red rectangles converse the locations of the two south-wall sections (S1 and S2) the do OSL samples were taken. The locations of OSL samples are shown in red circles, with the sample code shown interior (as an instance, no 1 represents GYD-OSL1; glance Extended Recordsdata Figs. Three, Four for added fundamental factors). a, b, Photography were adapted from a old look16, copyright 1986.

                                    3. Extended Recordsdata Fig. Three Normal watch of the residual profile S1 from the cave entrance.

                                      a, Portray taken from the internal of the cave, exhibiting the positioning of the residual profile S1 at the south wall (marked by a rectangle with fundamental factors shown in b and c). b, Portray exhibiting fundamental factors of the residual profile S1 at the south wall and the positioning of all OSL samples from layer 1 and layers Four–eight. The fundamental factors of layers Three–9 contained in the yellow rectangle are shown in c. c, Portray exhibiting the fundamental factors of sedimentary layers Three–9 of neighborhood B, and the positioning of OSL samples. The stratigraphic layer numbers are shown in blue circles and the positioning of OSL samples are marked by yellow circles with sample names shown next to every of them. The dashed yellow strains in b and c converse the boundaries between the layers.

                                    4. Extended Recordsdata Fig. Four Normal watch of the residual profile S2 commence air the cave entrance.

                                      a, Portray taken from prime of the cave, exhibiting the positioning of the residual profile S2 (indicated by the rectangle). b, Portray taken from commence air the cave, exhibiting the positioning of the residual profile S2 (indicated by the rectangle). c, Portray exhibiting the fundamental factors of sedimentary layers (layer 2 and transformed layer 1) of residual profile S2, and the positioning of OSL samples. The dashed yellow line displays the boundary between layers 1 and a pair of. The stratigraphic layer numbers are shown in blue circles and the positioning of OSL samples are marked by yellow circles with sample names shown next to every of them.

                                    5. Extended Recordsdata Fig. 5 Photos of selected Levallois cores.

                                      a, d, f, Levallois recurrent cores. b, c, e, Levallois preferential cores. The line drawings of these artefacts are shown in Fig. 3a–f. The artefacts shown in b and c were recovered from neighborhood A.

                                    6. Extended Recordsdata Fig. 6 Photos of selected Levallois flakes and instruments.

                                      gokay, n, Levallois flakes. l, Débordant. m, Instruments made on Levallois blanks. o, p, Pseudo-Levallois factors. The line drawings of these artefacts are shown in Fig. 3g–p.

                                    7. Extended Recordsdata Fig. 7 Photos of selected Levallois instruments and flakes with ready platform.

                                      qs, Instruments made on Levallois blanks. tz, Flakes with ready platforms. The line drawings of these artefacts are shown in Fig. 3q–z. The artefact shown in q was once recovered from neighborhood A, and these shown in r and s were from neighborhood B.

                                    8. Extended Recordsdata Fig. eight Distributions of metric variables on flakes.

                                      a, Histogram of flake lengths, coloured by size class. b, Box-and-whisker plots of a assortment of metric variables to converse technological variation across the size classes to issue the lithic prick payment sequence (n = 1,177 flakes). Centre strains converse data median, boxes converse first and 1/Three quartiles (the 25th and 75th percentiles), and the whiskers lengthen from the upper and decrease hinge to the biggest and smallest values that typically are no additional than 1.5 instances the interquartile differ from the hinge (which is the distance between the first and 1/Three quartiles). Recordsdata beyond the pause of the whiskers are outlying factors and are plotted for my piece. Linear dimensions are measured in mm, mass in g.

                                    9. Extended Recordsdata Fig. 9 Distributions of technological attributes of flakes across the 5 size classes.

                                      n = 1,177 flakes.

                                    10. Extended Recordsdata Fig. 10 Comparability of flakes from the upper (neighborhood A) and decrease (neighborhood B) layers of the deposit (n = 204), with 117 items from the decrease layers (dated to 170–160 ka) and 87 from the upper layer (dated to approximately ninety–eighty ka).

                                      a, Metric variables. Linear dimensions are measured in mm, mass in g. b, Technological variables. Centre strains converse data median, boxes converse first and 1/Three quartiles (the 25th and 75th percentiles), and the whiskers lengthen from the upper and decrease hinge to the biggest and smallest values no additional than 1.5 instances the interquartile differ from the hinge. Recordsdata beyond the pause of the whiskers are outlying factors and are plotted for my piece.

                                    Supplementary knowledge

                                    1. Supplementary Recordsdata

                                      This file contains Supplementary Discussions, Supplementary Tables 1-5, Supplementary Figures 1-24, References, and Supplementary Recordsdata.

                                    2. Reporting Abstract

                                    About this text

                                    Newsletter historic previous






                                    By submitting a observation you conform to abide by our Terms and Community Tricks. Whilst you happen to seem something abusive or that would not follow our phrases or pointers please flag it as substandard.